New Papers in Consciousness Studies 1

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-n3sdz-f29867

Today we’re starting a new series, with a rather different focus. Everyday interesting, important, inc-or cool papers on consciousness are coming out, and it’s impossible to keep up with them all. In this series I’ll pick out papers that look exciting to me as they go to press, and give them a quick once over for us.

 

The first paper is:

 

Gallagher, Colzi, & Sedda (in press 2021). Dissociation of proprioceptive drift and feelings of ownership in the somatic rubber hand illusion. Acta Psychologica, 212, 103192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103192

 

In the show I mention Irvine’s eliminativism about consciousness which you can read about:

Irvine, E. (2012). Consciousness As a Scientific Concept: A Philosophy of Science Perspective. Springer Science & Business Media.

Irvine, E. (2017). Explaining What? Topoi, 36(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-014-9273-4

 

For an introduction to conceptual and quality spaces:

Clark, A. (1993). Sensory Qualities. Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy.

Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geomentry of thought. The MIT Press.

Facebook//Reddit//Podbean//Spotify//WordPress//Apple Podcasts//Google Podcasts  

“Defending the semantic conception of computation in cognitive science.”

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-rpqgv-e5745d

One popular response to the “chinese room” thought experiment is to offer a broader notion of computation, one that doesn’t depend on rules manipulating syntax. What alternative is there, and what is the argument for it? I examine:

 

O’Brien (2011). Defending the semantic conception of computation in cognitive science. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 381–399.

 

to find out.

 

Join the conversation:

Facebook//Reddit//Podbean//Spotify//WordPress//Apple Podcasts//Google Podcasts  

Effects of appearance-based admonitions against sun exposure on tanning intentions in young adults.

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-gu48t-da89fb

Textbooks say that telling people about how tanning makes them less attractive reduces tanning and associated risks. Are they right?

Jones & Leary (1994). Effects of appearance-based admonitions against sun exposure on tanning intentions in young adults. Health Psychology, 13, 86–90.

https://www.facebook.com/The-Mind-in-1500-Words-107482607510237

The development of children’s knowledge about inner speech

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-y9a5v-d9223d

Textbooks claim: “preschoolers do not recognise the importance of ‘inner speech’ — using words inside one’s head — while performing tasks such as mental arithmetic.” Should we believe them?

 

Flavell, Green, Flavell, & Grossman, (1997). The development of children’s knowledge about inner speech. Child Development, 68(1), 39–47.

 

https://www.facebook.com/The-Mind-in-1500-Words-107482607510237

Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5- to 8 year-old girls

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-g8uk8-d79ae2

Does just looking at Barbie make girls feel they aren’t skinny enough?

Emme the doll: https://www.ecosia.org/images?q=Emme+doll

Join us on the facebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Mind-in-1500-Words-107482607510237

Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-exekn-d46880

Textbooks make claims like this: “studies have shown that participants subliminally primed with a word (e.g., ‘beach’) will more quickly recognise words semantically related to it (e.g., ‘sand’), even though they never consciously registered the prime.” Why should you believe such a claim.

See the Facebook for images referred to in the show.